The authors have designated this AOP as all rights reserved. Re-use in any form requires advanced permission from the authors.
AOP: 505
Title
Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) formation leads to cancer via inflammation pathway
Short name
Graphical Representation
Point of Contact
Contributors
- John Frisch
- Evgeniia Kazymova
Coaches
OECD Information Table
| OECD Project # | OECD Status | Reviewer's Reports | Journal-format Article | OECD iLibrary Published Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
This AOP was last modified on September 25, 2023 16:27
Revision dates for related pages
| Page | Revision Date/Time |
|---|---|
| Increased, Reactive oxygen species | July 26, 2023 14:34 |
| Oxidative Stress | March 21, 2023 15:16 |
| Increase, Inflammation | August 10, 2023 14:43 |
| General Apoptosis | April 04, 2018 14:51 |
| Increase, Cancer | August 10, 2023 14:59 |
| Increased, Reactive oxygen species leads to Oxidative Stress | August 15, 2023 10:05 |
| Oxidative Stress leads to Increase, Inflammation | August 15, 2023 10:38 |
| Increase, Inflammation leads to General Apoptosis | August 15, 2023 14:39 |
| General Apoptosis leads to Increase, Cancer | August 15, 2023 14:56 |
| Polyethylene AS low Mol.Wt. | July 31, 2023 09:43 |
| Polyvinyl chloride | July 31, 2023 09:45 |
Abstract
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are derived from oxygen molecules and can occur as free radicals (ex. superoxide, hydroxyl, peroxyl) or non-radicals (ex. ozone, singlet oxygen). ROS production occurs via a variety of normal cellular process; however, in stress situations (ex. exposure to radiation, chemical or biological stressors) reactive oxygen species levels dramatically increase and cause damage to cellular components. In this Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) we focus on the inflammation response to increases in oxidative stress. Inflammation pathways include a molecular response (ex. interleukins, cytokines, interferons) and produces visible tissue swelling during histology examinations. In this AOP we focus on the apoptosis response to cellular damage. Pathways leading to apoptosis, or single cell death, have traditionally been studied as both independent and simultaneous from pathways leading to necrosis, or tissue-wide cell death, with both overlap and distinct mechanisms (Elmore 2007). For the purposes of this AOP, we are characterizing cancer due to widespread cell-death, and recognize the complications in separating the related apoptosis and necrosis pathways.
AOP Development Strategy
Context
This Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) focuses on the pathway in which an established molecular disruption, increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leads to increased cancer through inflammation and cell/death/apoptosis. Environmental stressors leading to increased reactive oxygen species result in a variety of stress responses, visible through inflammation. These stress responses have been studied in many eukaryotes, including mammals (humans, lab mice, lab rats), teleost fish, and invertebrates (cladocerans, mussels).
Strategy
This AOP was developed as part of an Environmental Protection Agency effort to represent putative AOPs from peer-reviewed literature which were heretofore unrepresented in the AOP-Wiki. Jeong and Choi (2020) and Jeong and Choi (2019) provided initial network analysis from microplastic stressors, guided by weight of evidence from ToxCast assays of mammalian gene data. This publication, and the work cited within, were used create and support this AOP and its respective KE and KER pages.
The AOP-wiki authors did a further evaluation of published peer-reviewed literature to provide additional evidence in support of the AOP. Companion adverse outcome pathways are planned for two additional pathways initiated by reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to increased cancer: 1. Decreased, PPARalpha transactivation of gene expression leads to Alteration, lipid metabolism and 2. Acetylcholinesterase (AchE) Inhibition leads to Decrease, Mitochondrial ATP production.
Summary of the AOP
Events:
Molecular Initiating Events (MIE)
Key Events (KE)
Adverse Outcomes (AO)
| Type | Event ID | Title | Short name |
|---|
| MIE | 1115 | Increased, Reactive oxygen species | Increased, Reactive oxygen species |
| KE | 1392 | Oxidative Stress | Oxidative Stress |
| KE | 149 | Increase, Inflammation | Increase, Inflammation |
| KE | 1513 | General Apoptosis | General Apoptosis |
| AO | 885 | Increase, Cancer | Increase, Cancer |
Relationships Between Two Key Events (Including MIEs and AOs)
| Title | Adjacency | Evidence | Quantitative Understanding |
|---|
| Increased, Reactive oxygen species leads to Oxidative Stress | adjacent | High | Low |
| Oxidative Stress leads to Increase, Inflammation | adjacent | High | Low |
| Increase, Inflammation leads to General Apoptosis | adjacent | High | Low |
| General Apoptosis leads to Increase, Cancer | adjacent | High | Low |
Network View
Prototypical Stressors
Life Stage Applicability
| Life stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| All life stages | High |
Taxonomic Applicability
Sex Applicability
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Unspecific | High |
Overall Assessment of the AOP
The biological plausibility of KERs is strong due to the available mechanistic evidence present in studies from a wide variety of taxa. Increases in reactive oxygen (ROS) levels cause a variety of cellular responses. Jeong et al. (2020) used a weight-of-evidence approach in analyzing TOXCAST data, and proposed the putative AOP pathway from MIE Increased Reactive Oxygen Species to KE Oxidative Stress to KE Increase, Inflammation to KE General Apoptosis to AO Increase, Cancer.
The essentiality of KERs is strong due to a variety of evidence from different controlled experimental designs with controls. Exposure to a variety of chemical, physical, and biological stressors have induced oxidative stress from increases in reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. In this AOP we are focusing on the KERs between oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, and cancer, as strongly supported by a variety of studies. Other oxidative stress pathways lead to apoptosis and cancer (ex. peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR)/lipid metabolism pathway and acetylcholinesterase/mitochondrial energy metabolism pathway) as increases in reactive oxygen species (ROS) disrupt multiple cellular pathways. Additional evidence can be found in experimental designs that manipulate oxygen stress levels via use of strains of organisms with inhibited gene and enzyme function, as well as physical damage to nerves and organs of organisms.
The empirical support of KERs is largely found in toxicological studies derived from reference chemicals with dose-response and temporal concordance assessed. There are a large number of studies that have investigated the effects of increases in reactive oxygen species (ROS), because of researcher interest in the resulting cellular effects. Although there is a bias to publish studies that show an effect, and studies that show no effect are less likely to be published, given the number of dose-concordance studies from a wide variety of taxa, there is strong evidence in favor of the KERs represented in this AOP.
Domain of Applicability
Life Stage: The life stage applicable to this AOP is all life stages. Older individuals are more likely to manifest this adverse outcome pathway (adults > juveniles > embryos) due to accumulation of reactive oxygen species.
Sex: This AOP applies to both males and females.
Taxonomic: This AOP appears to be present broadly, with representative studies including mammals (humans, lab mice, lab rats), teleost fish, and invertebrates (cladocerans, mussels).
Essentiality of the Key Events
Support for the essentiality of the key events can be obtained from a wide diversity of taxonomic groups, with mammals (lab ice, lab rats, human cell lines), telost fish, and invertebrates (cladocerans and mussels) particularly well-studied.
Evidence Assessment
|
Path |
Support |
|
Increased, Reactive oxygen species leads to Oxidative Stress |
Biological plausibility is high. Representative studies have been done with mammals (Liu et al. 2015; Deng et al. 2017; Schrinzi et al. 2017; Jeong and Choi 2020); fish (Oliveira et al. 2013; Lu et al. 2016; Alomar et al. 2017; Chen et al. 2017; Veneman et al. 2017; Barboza et al. 2018; Choi et al. 2018; Espinosa et al. 2018); invertebrates (Browne et al. 2013; Avio et al. 2015; Jeong et al. 2016, 2017; Paul-Pont et al. 2016; Imhof et al. 2017; Lei et al. 2018; Yu et al. 2018). |
|
Oxidative Stress leads to Increase, Inflammation |
Biological plausibility is high. Representative studies have been done with mammals (Gamo et al. 2008; Jeong and Choi 2020); fish (Lu et al. 2016; Jin et al. 2018); invertebrates (Lei et al. 2018). For review (Wright and Kelly 2017). |
|
Increase, Inflammation leads to General Apoptosis |
Biological plausibility is high. Representative studies have been done with mammals (Gamo et al. 2008); fish (Karami et al. 2016; Lu et al. 2016; Jin et al. 2018). For review (Balkwill 2003, Villeneuve et al. 2018). |
|
General Apoptosis leads to Increase, Cancer |
Biological plausibility is high. Representative studies have been done with mammals (Pavet et al. 2014; Jeong and Choi 2020). For review (Heinlein and Chang 2004; Vihervaara and Sistonen 2014). |
Increased oxidative stress due to increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) has been established as plausible in mammals, fish, and invertebrates. Oxidative stress can be detected through changes in gene expression (ex. superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione S-transferase), protein content (ex. glutathione), and enzyme activity (ex. superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase).
Increased inflammation due to increased oxidative stress has been established as plausible in mammals, fish, and invertebrates. Inflammation is generally detected in histopathological examination of organs (ex. liver, intestines) or in changes in gene expression (ex. interleukins).
Increased apoptosis due to increased inflammation has been established as plausible in mammals and fish. Apoptosis is generally detected in histopathological examination of organs (ex. livers, brains) or in changes in gene expression (ex. tumor necrosis factor).
Increased cancer due to increased apoptosis has been established as plausible primarily in mammals, through histopathological examination of organs, uncontrolled cellular proliferation, and associated changes in gene expression.
For overview of the biological mechanisms involved in this AOP, see Liu et al. (2015) and Jeong and Choi (2020); their studies analyzed ToxCast in vitro assays of mammalian acute toxicity data to identify correlations between toxicity pathways and chemical stressors, providing support for the key event relationships represented here.
Known Modulating Factors
| Modulating Factor (MF) | Influence or Outcome | KER(s) involved |
|---|---|---|
Quantitative Understanding
Considerations for Potential Applications of the AOP (optional)
References
Alomar, C., Sureda, A., Capo, X., Guijarro, B., Tejada, S. and Deudero, S. 2017. Microplastic ingestion by Mullus surmuletus Linnaeus, 1758 fish and its potential for causing oxidative stress. Environmental Research 159: 135-142.
Avio, C.G., Gorbi, S., Milan, M., Benedetti, M., Fattorini, D., D’Errico, G., Pauletto, M., Bargelloni, L., and Regoli, F. 2015. Pollutants bioavailability and toxicological risk from microplastics to marine mussels. Environmental Pollutants 198: 211-222.
Barboza, LG.A., Vieira, L.R., Branco, V., Figueiredo, N., Carvalho, F., Carvalho, C., and Guilhermino, L. 2018. Microplastics cause neurotoxicity, oxidative damage and energy-related changes and interact with the bioaccumulation of mercury in the European seabass, Dicentrachus labrux (Linneaeus, 1758). Aquatic Toxicology 195: 49-57.
Balkwill, F. 2003. Chemokine biology in cancer. Seminars in Immunology 15: 49-55.
Browne, M.A. Niven, S.J., Galloway, T.S., Rowland, S.J., and Thompson, R.C. 2013. Microplastic moves pollutants and additives to worms, reducing functions linked to health and biodiversity. Current Biology 23: 2388-2392.
Chen, Q., Gundlach, M., Yang, S., Jiang, J., Velki, M., Yin, D., and Hollert, H. 2017 Quantitative investigation of the mechanisms of microplastics and nanoplastics toward larvae locomotor activity. Science of the Total Environment 584-585: 1022-1031.
Choi, J.S., Jung, Y.J., Hong, N.H., Hong, S.H., and Park, J.W. 2018. Toxicological effects of irregularly shaped and spherical microplastics in a marine teleost, the sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus). Marine Pollution Bulletin 129: 231-240.
Deng, Y., Zhang, Y., Lemos, B., and Ren, H. 2017. Tissue accumulation of microplastics in mice and biomarker responses suggest widespread health risks of exposure. Science Reports 7: 1-10.
Elmore, S. 2007. Apoptosis: A Review of Programmed Cell Death. Toxicologic pathology 35 (4): 495-516.
Espinosa, C., Garcia Beltran, J.M., Esteban, M.A., and Cuesta, A. 2018. In vitro effects of virgin microplastics on fish head-kidney leucocyte activities. Environmental Pollution 235: 30-38.
Gamo, K., Kiryu-Seo, S., Konishi, H., Aoki, S., Matushima, K., Wada, K., and Kiyama, H. 2008. G-protein-coupled receptor screen reveals a role for chemokine recepteor CCR5 in suppressing microglial neurotoxicity. Journal of Neuroscience 28: 11980-11988.
Heinlein, C.A. and Chang, C. 2004. Androgen receptor in prostate cancer. Endocrine Reviews 25: 276-308.
Imhof, H.K., Rusek, J., Thiel, M., Wolinska, J., and Laforsch, C. 2017. Do microplastic particles affect Daphnia magna at the morphological life history and molecular level? Public Library of Science One 12: 1-20.
Jeong, J. and Choi, J. 2019. Adverse outcome pathways potentially related to hazard identification of microplastics based on toxicity mechanisms. Chemosphere 231: 249-255.
Jeong, J. and Choi, J. 2020. Development of AOP relevant to microplastics based on toxicity mechanisms of chemical additives using ToxCast™ and deep learning models combined approach. Environment International 137:105557.
Jeong, C.B., Kang, H.M., Lee, M.C., Kim, D.H., Han, J., Hwang, D.S. Souissi, S., Lee, S.J., Shin, K.H., Park, H.G., and Lee, J.S. 2017. Adverse effects of microplastics and oxidative stress-induced MAPK/NRF2 pathway-mediated defense mechanisms in the marine copepod Paracyclopina nana. Science Reports 7: 1-11.
Jeong, C.B., Wong, E.J., Kang, H.M., Lee, M.C., Hwang, D.S., Hwang, U.K., Zhou, B., Souissi, S., Lee, S.J., and Lee, J.S. 2016. Microplastic size-dependent toxicity, oxidative stress induction, and p-JNK and p-p38 activation in the Monogonout rotifer (Brachionus koreanus). Environmental Science and Technology 50: 8849-8857.
Jin, Y., Xia, J., Pan, Z., Yang, J., Wang, W., and Fu, Z. 2018. Polystyrene microplastics induce microbiota dysbiosis and inflammation in the gut of adult zebrafish. Environmental Pollution 235: 322-329.
Karami, A., Romano, N., Galloway, T. and Hamzah, H. 2016. Virgin microplastics cause toxicity and modulate the impacts of phenanthrene on biomarker responses in African catfish (Clarias gariepinus). Environmental Research 151: 58-70.
Lei, L., Wu, S., Lu, S., Liu, M., Song, Y., Fu, Z., Shi, H., Raley-Susman, K.M., and He, D. 2018. Microplastic particles cause intestinal damage and other adverse effects in zebrafish Danio rerio and nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Science of the Total Environment 619-620: 1-8.
Liu, J., Mansouri, K., Judson, R.S., Martin, M.T., Hong, H., Chen, M., Xu, X., Thomas, R.S., and Shah, I. 2015. Predicting hepatoxicity using ToxCast in vitro bioactivity and chemical structure. Chemical Research in Toxicology 28: 738-751.
Lu, Y., Zhang, Y., Dengy, Y., Jiang, W., Zhao, Y., Geng, J., Ding, L., Ren, H. 2016. Uptake and accumulation of polystyrene microplastics in zebrafish (Danio rerio) and toxic effects in liver. Environmental Science and Technology 50: 4054-4060.
Oliveira, M., Ribeiro, A., Hylland, K., and Guilhermino, L. 2013. Single and combined effects of microplastics and pyrene on juveniles (0+ group) of the common goby Pomatoschistus microps (Teleostei, Gobiidae). Ecological Indicators 34: 641-647.
Paul-Pont, I., Lacroix, C., Gonzalez Fernandez, D., Hegaret, H., Lambert, C., Le Goic, N., Frere, L., Cassone, A.L., Sussarellu, R. Fabioux, C., Guyomarch, J., Albentosa, M., Huvet, A., and Soudant, P. 2016. Exposure of marine mussels Mytillus spp. to polystyrene microplastics: Toxicity and influence on fluoranthene bioaccumulation. Environmental Pollution 216: 724-737.
Pavet, V., Shlyakhtina, Y., He, T., Ceschin, D.G., Kohonen, P., Perala, M., Kallioniemi, O., and Gronemeyer, H. 2014. Plasminogen activator urokinase expression reveals TRAIL responsiveness and support fractional survival of cancer cells. Cell Death and Disease 5: e1043.
Schrinzi, G.F., Perez-Pomeda, I., Sanchis, J., Rossini, C., Farre, M., and Barcelo, D. 2017. Cytotoxic effects of commonly used nanomaterials and microplastics on cerebral and epithelial human cells. Environmental Research 159: 579-587.
Veneman, W.J., Spaink, H.P., Brun, N.R., Bosker, T., and Vijver, M.G. 2017. Pathway analysis of systemic transcriptome responses to injected polystyrene particles in zebrafish larvae. Aquatic Toxicology 190: 112-120.
Vihervaara, A. and Sistonen, L. 2014. HSF1 at a glance. Journal of Cell Scientce 127: 261-266.
Villeneuve, D.L., Landesmann, B., Allavena, P., Ashley, N., Bal-Price, A., Corsini, E., Halappanavar, S., Hussell, T., Laskin, D., Lawrence, T., Nikolic-Paterson, D., Pallary, M., Paini, A., Pietrs, R., Roth, R., and Tschudi-Monnet, F. 2018. Toxicological Sciences 346:352.
Wright, S.L. and Kelly, F.J. 2017. Plastic and human health: a micro issue? Enviromental Science and Technology 51: 6634-6647.
Yu, P., Liu, Z., Wu, D., Chen, M., Lv, W., and Zhao, Y. 2018. Accumulation of polystyrene microplastics in juvenile Eriocheir sinensis and oxidative stress effects in the liver. Aquatic Toxicology 200: 28-36.