This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 2966

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

Increased, Reactive oxygen species leads to Apoptosis

Upstream event
The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help
Downstream event
The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name Adjacency Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding Point of Contact Author Status OECD Status
Activation of MEK-ERK1/2 leads to deficits in learning and cognition via ROS and apoptosis adjacent Not Specified Not Specified Cataia Ives (send email) Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER.  More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
Rattus norvegicus Rattus norvegicus Moderate NCBI

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help
Sex Evidence
Unspecific Moderate

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER.  More help

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

ROS generation in normal cells, including neurons, occurs within homeostatic control. When ROS levels exceed the antioxidant capacity of a cell, a deleterious condition known as oxidative stress occurs (Klein and Ackerman 2003). Unchecked, excessive ROS can lead to the destruction of cellular components including lipids, protein, and DNA, and ultimately cell death via apoptosis or necrosis (Kannan and Jain 2000).

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings.  Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

This KER was identified as part of an Environmental Protection Agency effort to represent putative AOPs from peer-reviewed literature which were heretofore unrepresented in the AOP-Wiki. The KER is referenced in publications which were cited in the originating work for the putative AOP "Activation of MEK-ERK1/2 leads to deficits in learning and cognition via ROS and apoptosis", Katherine von Stackelberg & Elizabeth Guzy & Tian Chu & Birgit Claus Henn, 2015. Exposure to Mixtures of Metals and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes: A Multidisciplinary Review Using an Adverse Outcome Pathway Framework, Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(6), pages 971-1016, June.

Evidence Map 2.0

ID Experimental Design Species Upstream Observation Downstream Observation Citation (first author, year) Notes

Evidence Map

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help
Title First Author
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance
Temporal Concordance
Incidence Concordance
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance Evidence
Temporal Concordance Evidence
Incidence Concordance Evidence
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help

ROS and/or oxidative damage can activate gene transcription and transcribed genes may be implicated in either cell survival or cell death (Klein and Ackerman 2003).

The increase in reactive oxygen species at As(III) concentrations of 0.5 mg/l or more may play an apoptogenic role and/or be a consequence of events occurring during apoptosis (Rocha et al. 2011). It is generally reported that ROS cause an increase in [Ca2+]i of various cell types, which might be one of the causes for the C17.2 cells to enter apoptosis (Rocha et al. 2011). According to Hool and Corry (2007), the redox control of Ca2+ transport is due to the fact that ROS can react with the thiol groups of protein that form part of the Ca2+ transporters or channels. Alternatively, mitochondrial matrix Ca2+ overload can lead to enhanced generation of reactive oxygen species, triggering the permeability transition pore, dissipation of transmembrane mithocondrial potential, and cytochrome c release (Brookes et al., 2004). In any case, the fact that treatment with various antioxidants (vitamin E, tocopherol, and quercetin) did not rescue the cells from death by apoptosis indicates that oxidative stress was not the main cause of the observed cell death (Rocha et al. 2011).

Superoxides and lipid peroxidation are increased during apoptosis induced by myriad stimuli (Bredesen 1995). However, generation of ROS may be a relatively late event, occurring after cells have embarked on a process of caspase activation (Green and Reed 1998). In this regard, attempts to study apoptosis under conditions of anoxia have demonstrated that at least some proapoptotic stimuli function in the absence or near absence of oxygen, which implies that ROSs are not the sine qua non of apoptosis (Jacobson and Raff 1995). However, ROSs can be generated under conditions of virtual anaerobiosis (Degli Esposti and McLennan 1998), and thus their role in apoptosis cannot be excluded solely on this basis (Green and Reed 1998).

Okouchi et. al. (2007) found that PC12 apoptosis can be initiated by GSH/GSSG redox imbalance alone independently of ROS generation (Pias et al., 2003), suggesting that a loss of cellular  redox homeostasis is downstream of ROS signaling in neuronal cell apoptosis.

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references.  More help

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help