This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 2859

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

Increase, Mucin production leads to Decreased lung function

Upstream event
The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help
Downstream event
The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name Adjacency Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding Point of Contact Author Status OECD Status
EGFR Activation Leading to Decreased Lung Function adjacent Moderate Moderate Cataia Ives (send email) Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite Under Development

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER.  More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
Homo sapiens Homo sapiens Moderate NCBI
Rattus norvegicus Rattus norvegicus Moderate NCBI
Mustela furo Mustela putorius furo Moderate NCBI

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help
Sex Evidence
Unspecific

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER.  More help

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

Increased mucin production and mucus hypersecretion following acute exposure are thought to contribute to innate airway defenses and are most likely limited by anti-inflammatory mechanisms aimed at resolving the exposure-related stress (Ramos, Krahnke, and Kim 2014; Rose and Voynow 2006). However, under chronic exposure conditions, with a support of increased number of specialized mucin-expressing goblet cells, mucus production sustains. When intracellular mucin is secreted into the lumen, it gets hydrated and expands massively (Verdugo 1991) leading to airway narrowing which ultimately decreases the airflow to lungs. This process may lead to airway obstruction and progressive decline in lung function (Aoshiba and Nagai 2004; Victor Kim and Criner 2015; Vestbo, Prescott, and Lange 1996). The association between increased mucin production and lung function decrease is correlative and is described in human patients as well as in animal models. The link between mucus hypersecretion and decreased lung function as well as increased hospitalization / mortality rates is shown in various clinical studies (Ekberg-Aronsson et al. 2005; Vestbo and Rasmussen 1989; Lahousse et al. 2017; Corhay et al. 2013). Lung function is commonly tested through spirometry by measuring forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) – the maximum volume of air that can forcibly be exhaled during the first second following maximal inhalation and forced vital capacity (FVC) – the maximum volume of air that can forcibly be exhaled following maximal inhalation. 

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings.  Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

The relevant research articles supporting this KER were identified using keywords: “mucin” or “mucus” AND terms for pulmonary function test (spirometry) parameters such as “FEV/forced expiratory volume” or “FVC/forced vital capacity” or “VC/ vital capacity” or “PEF/peak expiratory flow” as well as other search terms of lung capacity measures such as “plethysmography”. Referenced articles within retrieved studies and reviews were also consulted. Not all retrieved articles were included as a support for this KER since they generally repeat the same conclusions listed in the evidence texts below. 

Evidence Map 2.0

ID Experimental Design Species Upstream Observation Downstream Observation Citation (first author, year) Notes

Evidence Map

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help
Title First Author
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance
Temporal Concordance
Incidence Concordance
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance Evidence
Temporal Concordance Evidence
Incidence Concordance Evidence
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help

Physiological response to stressors that increase mucin production often is resolved after stressor exposure is eliminated, and the normal function of the airway is restored. For this KER to occur, sustained mucin production should ensue. Moreover, the KER is based on assumption that increased mucin production logically leads to mucin hypersecretion. However, when mucin secretion is inhibited (e.g. through MANS peptide (Singer et al. 2004)), increase in mucin production might not translate into mucin hypersecretion. A study of endobronchial biopsies from patients with mild and moderate asthma showed an increase in stored mucin compared with healthy controls. Stored mucin levels were similar in mild and moderate asthma patients, however secreted mucin was significantly lower in mild asthma patients than in moderate asthma patients (28.4 ± 6.3 versus 73.5 ± 47.5 µg/ml). These data add uncertainty to the KER by signifying the role of mucin secretion which is needed for downstream KE to occur (Ordoñez et al. 2001).  

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references.  More help
Modulating Factor (MF) MF Specification Effect(s) on the KER Reference(s)
Mucociliary clearance (MCC) Mucus removal through ciliary movement Impaired MCC contributes to decreased lung function (see also AOPs 411, 424, 425) Ramos, Krahnke, and Kim 2014

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help

Increased mucin production correlating with decreased lung function was shown in human patients and animal models (ferret and rodents).