This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 2847

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

Energy Deposition leads to Altered Bone Cell Homeostasis

Upstream event
The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help
Downstream event
The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name Adjacency Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding Point of Contact Author Status OECD Status
Deposition of energy leading to occurrence of bone loss non-adjacent High Low Cataia Ives (send email) Open for citation & comment

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER.  More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
human Homo sapiens Moderate NCBI
mouse Mus musculus Moderate NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus Moderate NCBI

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help
Sex Evidence
Male Moderate
Female Moderate

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER.  More help
Term Evidence
Adult Moderate
Juvenile Low

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

Energy deposition in the form of ionizing radiation (IR) exposure can result in a loss of homeostasis among the osteocyte, osteoclast, and osteoblast bone cells. The severity of the irradiation effects is influenced by dose, dose rate, and the level of linear energy transfer (LET) between IR and bone tissue. The energy deposited into cells causes ionization events that can lead to oxidative stress, which may induce cell death and alter signalling pathways in the bone microenvironment that regulate the differentiation and activity of bone remodeling cells (Willey et al., 2011). Bone cells can be dysregulated by deposited energy from a variety of IR types, including X-rays, gamma rays, and heavy ions, and has been observed at a wide range of doses from 0-30 Gy. IR-induced changes to bone cell homeostasis are defined by progenitor cell proliferation, markers for osteoblast and osteoclast activity, and the number and surface area of both cell types on a sample.

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings.  Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

The strategy for collating the evidence on radiation stressors to support the relationship is described in Kozbenko et al 2022. Briefly, a scoping review methodology was used to prioritize studies based on a population, exposure, outcome, endpoint statement.

Evidence Map 2.0

ID Experimental Design Species Upstream Observation Downstream Observation Citation (first author, year) Notes

Evidence Map

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help
Title First Author
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance
Temporal Concordance
Incidence Concordance
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance Evidence
Temporal Concordance Evidence
Incidence Concordance Evidence
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help
  • Not all radiation qualities and doses of radiation will alter bone cell homeostasis in the same way. Low doses (<1 Gy) of low LET electromagnetic radiation (X-rays and gamma rays) are shown to increase osteoblasts and decrease osteoclasts, while high doses do the opposite (Donaubauer et al., 2020). This is in contrast with particle irradiation, where osteoblasts are decreased and osteoclasts are increased at low and high doses (Donaubauer et al., 2020). 

  • There are differences in the mechanisms of altered bone cell homeostasis between humans and animals during spaceflight. In humans, increased osteoclast activity is the main cause of bone loss, while in rats, resorption was unchanged (Fu et al., 2021; Stavnichuk et al., 2020). However, microgravity is also a stressor in this case and not just radiation, and there are differences in how this is measured between humans and animals.

  • At 3 days post-irradiation, da Cruz Vegian et al. (2020) found that, in addition to an IR-induced increase in TRAP levels (osteoclastogenesis marker), rats that underwent 30 Gy irradiation also experienced a significant, ~8-fold increase in levels of the osteoblastogenesis marker, OCN, compared to non-irradiated controls. In addition, TRAP levels experienced a time-dependent decrease. This is contrary to the increase in osteoclastogenesis and decrease in osteoblastogenesis generally seen post-irradiation.

  • Chen et al. (2014) showed increased OCN mRNA expression and protein activity after 0.5 or 5 Gy X-ray irradiation, which is contrary to the decrease in osteoblastogenesis following irradiation observed in other studies. This may be explained by the survival strategy of osteoblasts to retain cell division for DNA repair as opposed to undergoing programmed death (Chen et al., 2014).

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references.  More help

Modulating factor

Details

Effects on the KER

References

Drug 

Risedronate (osteoporosis drug that blocks osteoclast activity) 

Returned TRAP5b levels to near baseline and reduced the osteoclast count after radiation 

Willey et al., 2010 

Drug 

α-2-macroglobulin (α2M); a radio-protective macromolecule 

Treatment at 0.25 and 0.5 mg/mL slightly restored ALP activity. 

Liu et al., 2018 

Age 

Old age 

Lower estrogen at old age is thought to increase osteoclast activity, compounding with the effects of radiation. 

Pacheco and Stock, 2013 

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help

The evidence for the taxonomic applicability to humans is moderate as majority of the evidence is from in vitro human-derived cells, but one study performed a meta-analysis of astronauts. The relationship is supported in vivo mainly by mouse models with a few studies looking at rat models. The relationship has been shown in both male and female animal models. The relationship is plausible at any life stage. However, majority of studies have used adult animal models.