This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 2846

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

Oxidative Stress leads to Altered Bone Cell Homeostasis

Upstream event
The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help
Downstream event
The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name Adjacency Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding Point of Contact Author Status OECD Status
Deposition of energy leading to occurrence of bone loss non-adjacent Moderate Low Cataia Ives (send email) Open for citation & comment

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER.  More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
human Homo sapiens Low NCBI
mouse Mus musculus High NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus Moderate NCBI

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help
Sex Evidence
Male Moderate
Female Low

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER.  More help
Term Evidence
Adult Moderate
Juvenile Moderate

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

The tight regulation of differentiation pathways leading to bone-forming osteoblasts (osteoblastogenesis) and bone-resorbing osteoclasts (osteoclastogenesis) is essential for the maintenance of osteogenic balance, i.e., the deposition and resorption of bone matrix. As such, perturbations by the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) during oxidative stress can have devastating effects on the delicate balance of bone cell (i.e., osteocyte, osteoclast, and osteoblast) differentiation and function. 

Oxidative stress disrupts the homeostatic balance of osteoblastic bone deposition and osteoclastic bone resorption by altering the osteoblastogenic/osteoclastogenic differentiation pathways through the overproduction of ROS (Tian et al., 2017). Briefly, ROS produced in pre-osteoblasts and pre-osteoclasts will affect the activities of different signaling molecules in the respective cell types. In osteoblasts, ROS naturally upregulate expression of the transcription factor forkhead box O (FoxO) which enhances cell antioxidant status. FoxO requires ß-catenin binding, which sequesters ß-catenin from the main osteoblast differentiation pathway, the Wnt/ß-catenin pathway, ultimately downregulating osteoblastogenesis and the expression of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and osteocalcin (OCN) (Manolagas and Almeida, 2007; Tian et al., 2017). Further, ROS upregulate the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANK-L), which is the main regulator of osteoclastogenesis. By increasing RANK-L production, ROS inhibits osteoclast apoptosis and promotes osteoclastogenesis and the expression of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), Cathepsin K (CTSK), and HCl (Tian et al., 2017).

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings.  Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

The strategy for collating the evidence on radiation stressors to support the relationship is described in Kozbenko et al 2022. Briefly, a scoping review methodology was used to prioritize studies based on a population, exposure, outcome, endpoint statement.

Evidence Map 2.0

ID Experimental Design Species Upstream Observation Downstream Observation Citation (first author, year) Notes

Evidence Map

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help
Title First Author
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance
Temporal Concordance
Incidence Concordance
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance Evidence
Temporal Concordance Evidence
Incidence Concordance Evidence
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help
  • One study suggests X-ray radiation results in a dose-dependent increase in oxidative stress and bone resorption parameters only at doses above 2 Gy (Kook et al., 2015). This, however, is inconsistent with other studies performed at doses of 1-2 Gy, which indicate a significant effect of radiation on ROS production, TRAP expression, and ALP activity at lower doses (≤2 Gy) (Huang et al., 2018; Huang et al., 2019; Kondo et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2020). Further research is needed to elucidate the effects of low doses, as well as the dose-dependent effect of increasing doses of ionizing radiation (IR).

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references.  More help

Modulating factor 

Details 

Effects on the KER 

References 

Drug 

α2M 

Treatment reversed the radiation-induced effects on ALP and SOD activity 

Liu et al., 2018 

Drug 

N-acetyl cysteine 

2.5 and 5 mM reversed the effects of 8 Gy radiation on ROS levels and ALP activity 

Kook et al., 2015 

Drug 

AMI 

Treatment with 30 mg/kg reversed the radiation-induced effects on ROS levels, ALP activity and TRAP-5b levels 

Huang et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2020 

Drug 

CeO

Treatment with 100 nM lowered dihydroethidium (DHE) and H2O2 levels and partially restored Alizarin red optical density 

Wang et al., 2016 

Drug 

Sema3a 

Treatment with 50 ng/mL partially reduced ROS levels and reversed TRAP stain to below controls 

Huang et al., 2018 

Drug 

Curcumin (antioxidant) 

Fully reversed all oxidative stress and altered bone cell homeostasis 

Xin et al., 2015 

Drug 

Hydrogen water 

Reversed microgravity-induced effects on oxidative stress and altered bone cell homeostasis 

Sun et al., 2013 

Drug 

Polyphenol S3 

Fully reversed microgravity-induced oxidative stress, osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis 

Diao et al., 2018 

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help

The evidence for the taxonomic applicability to humans is low as majority of the evidence is from in vitro human-derived cells. The relationship is supported by mice and rat models using male and female animals. The relationship is plausible at any life stage. However, most studies have used adolescent and adult animal models