This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 2836

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

Increase, Neural Remodeling leads to Impairment, Learning and memory

Upstream event
The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help
Downstream event
The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name Adjacency Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding Point of Contact Author Status OECD Status
Deposition of Energy Leading to Learning and Memory Impairment adjacent Moderate Low Brendan Ferreri-Hanberry (send email) Open for citation & comment

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER.  More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
mouse Mus musculus Moderate NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus Moderate NCBI

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help
Sex Evidence
Male Moderate
Female Low

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER.  More help
Term Evidence
Adult Moderate
Not Otherwise Specified Low
Juvenile Low

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

Neural stem cells (NSCs) come from different sources, such as the subgranular zone (SGZ) located in the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampal formation, and the subventricular zone (SVZ) region of the brain. NSCs give rise to mature neurons that are then able to receive signals from other neurons (Bálentová & Adamkov, 2020; Hladik & Tapio, 2016; Monje & Palmer, 2003; Romanella et al., 2020; Tomé et al., 2015). Changes in neuronal architecture can lead to altered synaptic activity, necrosis, demyelination, neurogenesis, neurodegeneration, and dendrite morphology, all of which encompass neural remodeling (Hladik & Tapio, 2016; Monje & Palmer, 2003; Tomé et al., 2015). These alterations can then cause cognitive deficits in the form of impaired learning and memory (Barker & Warburton, 2011; Hladik & Tapio, 2016; Monje & Palmer, 2003; Tomé et al., 2015). Impaired learning consists reduced ability to create new associative or non-associative relationships, whereas impaired memory consists of decreased ability to establish sensory, short-term or long-term memories (Desai et al., 2022; Kiffer et al., 2019). Multiple brain areas are involved these processes, such as the hippocampal region, amygdala, prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia, and other areas of the neocortex (Cucinotta et al., 2014; Desai et al., 2022; NCRP Commentary, 2016). 

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings.  Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

The strategy for collating the evidence to support the relationship is described in Kozbenko et al 2022. Briefly, a scoping review methodology was used to prioritize studies based on a population, exposure, outcome, endpoint statement.

Evidence Map 2.0

ID Experimental Design Species Upstream Observation Downstream Observation Citation (first author, year) Notes

Evidence Map

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help
Title First Author
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance
Temporal Concordance
Incidence Concordance
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance Evidence
Temporal Concordance Evidence
Incidence Concordance Evidence
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help
  • One study observed cognitive deficits in the one- and two-way avoidance, press-lever avoidance, and water maze tests, but through pathological examination, no abnormalities were seen in the brains (white matter and axons were normal with no inflammation or glial response) (Lamproglou et al., 1995). This is indicative of impaired cognition without any changes in neuron integrity.  

  • At 25 Gy of X-irradiation, Hodges et al. (1998) observed both neural remodeling and impaired learning and memory. However, at 20 Gy in the same study, neural remodeling was not observed.  

  • Whoolery et al. (2017) found that neural remodeling was high at 1 Gy and low and 0.2 Gy but found impaired learning and memory at 0.2 Gy and not at 1 Gy.  

  • Miry et al. (2021) found that 1 Gy of 56Fe particles led to increased learning and memory 20 months after exposure, although this is part of the compensatory or repair mechanisms following early suppressive changes.  

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references.  More help

Modulating factor  

Details  

Effects on the KER  

References  

Sex 

Female mice 

Female mice were protected from the GCR-induced deficits in learning and memory and did not show changes in synapse levels 

Krukowski et al., 2018 

Antioxidant 

α-tocopherol 

Improved global cognitive ability, memory and executive function 

Hladik & Tapio, 2016 

Stem cells 

Human neural stem cell treatment 

Increased neurogenesis in the brain after radiation and improved learning and memory 

Hladik & Tapio, 2016 

Drug 

Ramipril (Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor) 

Mitigated neurodegeneration and prevented cognitive impairment 

Hladik & Tapio, 2016 

Drug 

Memantine (NMDA receptor antagonist) 

Reduced rate of memory decline after radiotherapy 

Bálentová & Adamkov, 2020 

Hypoxia 

Systemic hypoxia 

Systemic hypoxia reversed the effects of radiation on learning and memory 

Bálentová & Adamkov, 2020; Hladik & Tapio, 2016 

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help

Evidence for this relationship comes from rat and mouse models. There is in vivo evidence in both male and female animals, with more evidence in males. Animal age is occasionally not indicated in studies, but most evidence is in adult rodent models.