This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
Relationship: 2811
Title
Oxidative Stress leads to Increase, DNA strand breaks
Upstream event
Downstream event
AOPs Referencing Relationship
| AOP Name | Adjacency | Weight of Evidence | Quantitative Understanding | Point of Contact | Author Status | OECD Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deposition of energy leading to occurrence of cataracts | adjacent | Moderate | Low | Arthur Author (send email) | Open for citation & comment | |
| Deposition of Energy Leading to Learning and Memory Impairment | adjacent | Moderate | Moderate | Brendan Ferreri-Hanberry (send email) | Open for citation & comment | |
| Deposition of energy leads to vascular remodeling | adjacent | High | Moderate | Cataia Ives (send email) | Open for citation & comment |
Taxonomic Applicability
Sex Applicability
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Unspecific | Low |
| Male | Low |
Life Stage Applicability
| Term | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Adult | Low |
| Not Otherwise Specified | Low |
Oxidative stress is an event that involves both a reduction in free radical scavengers and enzymes, and an increase in free radicals (Brennan et al., 2012). Oxidative stress needs to be maintained within an organism to avoid an excess of damage to biological structures, such as DNA. A redox homeostasis between the radicals and the scavengers is necessary. Between reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), collectively known as RONS, ROS is particularly significant to oxidative damage and disease states. Radicals such as singlet oxygen and hydroxyl radical are highly unstable and will react with molecules near their generation point, while radicals such as H2O2 are more stable and membrane permeable, meaning they can travel further to find electrons (Spector, 1990). Since DNA is mainly found in nucleus, ROS needs to reach the nucleus to induce breaks. Hydroxyl radicals, in addition to being highly reactive, are capable of causing DNA damage (Halliwell et al., 2021; Engwa et al., 2020). The regulation of these radicals is achieved by the antioxidant defense response (ADR), which includes enzymatic and non-enzymatic processes. The ADR is recruited to manage RONS levels, with antioxidants such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) functioning as the first line of defense (Engwa et al., 2020). These antioxidants act as scavengers to oxidants, reacting with them before reaching other structures within the cell such as DNA strands (Cabrera et al., 2011; Engwa et al., 2020). The backbone of DNA can fragment upon sustained exposure to ROS (Uwineza et al., 2019; Cannan et al., 2016). Due to low oxidation potentials, adenine and guanine are the DNA bases more prone to oxidation, with oxidation potentials (normal hydrogen electrode) at pH 7 of 1.3 eV and 1.42 eV compared to the 1.6 eV and 1.7 eV of cytosine and thymine (Fong, 2016; Halliwell et al., 2021; Poetsch, 2020). In fact, certain radicals even target guanine in a selective fashion, including carbonate anion radical (CO3•-) and singlet oxygen (1O2) (Halliwell et al., 2021).
The strategy for collating the evidence to support the relationship is described in Kozbenko et al 2022. Briefly, a scoping review methodology was used to prioritize studies based on a population, exposure, outcome, endpoint statement.
| ID | Experimental Design | Species | Upstream Observation | Downstream Observation | Citation (first author, year) | Notes |
|---|
| Title | First Author | Biological Plausibility |
Dose Concordance |
Temporal Concordance |
Incidence Concordance |
|---|
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance Evidence
Temporal Concordance Evidence
Incidence Concordance Evidence
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
N/A
There is limited evidence demonstrating this relationship across different life stages/ages or sexes (Cencer et al., 2018; Li et al., 1998).
|
Modulating Factors |
MF Details |
Effects on the KER |
References |
|
Age |
Reduced antioxidant capacities have been linked to aged lenses (in humans >30 years old). The development of a chemical barrier between the cortex and the nucleus is partially responsible, as it prevents GSH from protecting aged lens cells from ROS. |
Prevention of RONS-mediated damage is primarily achieved by antioxidants, so a lowered capacity would likely lead to reduced damage mitigation abilities. 78% of lens over 30 had a low level of GSH in the center compared to 14% of lens under 30. Lens epithelial cells have an associated 3-fold increase in γ-H2AX (marker of DNA damage) when GSH-PX decreases by 2-fold. |
Taylor & Davies, 1987; Cabrera & Chihuailaf, 2011; Quinlan & Hogg, 2018; Sweeney & Truscott, 1998; Meng & Fang, 2021 |
|
Free radical scavengers |
ROS-scavengers are essential components of the body’s natural defense against oxidative damage. Increased ROS production leads to increased incidence of electron donation by scavengers, thus reducing the overall level of free radical scavengers available to deal with ROS. |
Isothiocyanates, such as sulforaphane (SFN), activate the release of more enzymatic scavengers. When SFN was added to in vitro LECs, LDH decreased to near unexposed cell levels and was associated with 3.3x less DNA strand breaks compared to the non-SFN cells following stressor exposure. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) also has antioxidant properties and was shown to alleviate radiation-induced increases in oxidative stress and DNA strand breaks within rat hippocampi. |
Taylor et al., 1987; Cabrera et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2013; El-Missiry et al., 2018 |
|
Media |
Mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned medium (MSC-CM), which has self-renewal, differential and proliferation capacities. |
MSC-CM treatment has also been shown to improve ROS levels and decrease radiation-induced DNA strand breaks within mouse hippocampal neuronal cells. |
Huang et al., 2021 |
The following tables provide representative examples of the relationship, unless otherwise indicated, all data is significantly significant.
Dose Concordance
|
Reference |
Experiment Description |
Result |
|
Cencer et al., 2018 |
In vitro, human LECs exposed to UVB and tested for 120 min post exposure with fluorescent probes to detect ROS production and mitochondrial superoxide, and tetramethylrhodamine-dUTP (TMR) red assay to detect strand breaks. |
Both ROS and DNA strand breaks were increased by both 0.014 J/cm2 and 0.14 J/cm2 UVB radiation. At 0.014 J/cm2, cellular ROS increased a maximum of 15 fluorescence units above the control at 5 minutes post-UVB, while DNA strand breaks increased about 115 fluorescence units above the control at this time. At 0.14 J/cm2, cellular ROS increased a maximum of about 35 fluorescence units above the control at 90 minutes post-UVB, while mitochondrial superoxide increased about 30 fluorescence units above the control and DNA strand breaks increased about 125 fluorescence units above the control at this time.
|
|
Ahmadi et al., 2021 |
In vitro, human LECs exposed to 0.065-0.3 Gy/min gamma radiation, with dihydroethdium (DHE) fluorescent probes to measure ROS levels and comet assay to measure strand breaks. |
Human LECs exposed in vitro to 0.1 - 0.5 Gy gamma rays showed a gradual increase in ROS levels and a corresponding gradual increase in DNA in the tail from the comet assay (indicative of increased DNA strand breaks) with the maximum dose displaying a 10% increase in ROS levels and a 17% increase in DNA strand damage. |
|
Li et al., 1998 |
In vitro, bovine LECs were exposed to 40 and 400 µM H2O2 with an alkaline unwinding assay to determine strand break levels. |
Immediately after LECs were exposed to 40 µM and 400 µM H2O2, there were ~145% and ~150% DNA strand breaks compared to the unexposed control level, respectively. The amounts of DNA strand breaks in cells exposed to both concentrations were reduced to ~105% of the unexposed control level after 30 mins. After 400 µM H2O2, oxidative stress as measured by LDH was 1200% of control in neuroblastoma cells. |
|
Spector et al., 1997 |
In vitro, rat LECs exposed to 100 and 125 µM H2O2 with alkaline elution assay to determine single strand break level. |
Exposure to 125 µM of H2O2 to lens epithelial cells resulted in reduction of intact DNA to near 1% by 9 hr post-exposure. Exposure to 100 µM H2O2 reduced SOD and GSH levels by 2-fold. |
|
El-Missiry et al., 2018 |
In vivo, albino Wistar rats were exposed to 4 Gy of γ radiation (137Cs source) at 0.695 rad/s. Kits were used to measure 4-HNE (secondary product of lipid peroxidation) and protein carbonyl group levels as markers of oxidative stress. Antioxidants including GSH, GPx and GR were also assessed. The comet assay was used to analyze DNA strand breaks by visualizing DNA tail %, tail length and tail moment. |
4-HNE and protein carbonyl levels increased by approximately 2- and 3-fold after radiation exposure. GSH and GPx levels decreased by approximately 3-fold each, whereas GR levels decreased by approximately 5-fold. Tail DNA %, tail length and tail moment increased by approximately 2-, 3- and 6-fold after exposure to 4 Gy. |
|
Ungvari et al., 2013 |
In vitro. CMVECs and rat hippocampal neurons were irradiated with 2-8 Gy 137Cs gamma rays. 5(and 6)-chloromethyl-2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate acetyl ester (CM-H2DCFDA) staining, and flow cytometry were used to measure ROS production. DNA damage was quantified by measuring the tail DNA content (as a percentage of total DNA) using the Comet Assay-IV software. |
Day 1 post-irradiation showed increased cellular peroxide production and increased mitochondrial oxidative stress in CMVECs in a dose-dependent manner, increasing a maximum of ~3-fold at 8 Gy. Tail DNA content also increased in a dose-dependent manner with an approximate increase from 0 to 45% at 8 Gy. |
|
Huang et al., 2021 |
In vitro, HT22 cells (mouse hippocampal neuronal cell line) were exposed to 10 Gy of X-irradiation at 6 Gy/min. ROS levels were measured using H2-DCFDA staining and fluorescence microscope analysis, whereas western blotting was used to detect γ-H2AX. |
At 10 Gy, intracellular ROS generation increased by 5-fold and γ-H2AX increased by 3-fold. |
|
Zhang et al., 2017 |
In vitro. HT22 cells were exposed to 8 and 12 Gy X-rays. Relative intracellular ROS levels were determined by DCFDA. p-ATM, γ-H2AX were measured with Western blot. |
Following 8 Gy irradiation, intracellular ROS levels increased ~1.8-fold. Phosphorylation of ATM and γ-H2AX were increased 4.4-fold and 3.2-fold, respectively, 30 minutes after 12 Gy. |
|
Cervelli et al., 2014 |
In vitro. HUVECs were irradiated with single doses (0.125, 0.25, 0.5 Gy), or fractionated doses (2 × 0.125 Gy, 2 × 0.250 Gy) of X-rays. Intracellular ROS generation was measured with a fluorescent dye, C-DCFDA, using a spectrofluorometer. Immunofluorescence microscopy was used to measure γ-H2AX foci. |
Intracellular ROS production was significantly increased in a dose-dependent manner (1.6-, 2- and 2.8-fold at 0.125, 0.25, 0.5 Gy, respectively). When HUVECs were exposed to fractionated doses, no increase in ROS generation was observed, compared with respective single doses. 24h post-irradiation the percentage of foci-positive cells exposed to 0.125 Gy, 2 × 0.125 Gy, 0.250 Gy, 2 × 0.250 Gy and 0.5 Gy, was 1.68, 1.48, 3.53, 2.59, 8.74-fold over the control, respectively. |
|
Sakai et al., 2017 |
In vitro. HAECs were exposed to 100uM H2O2. Intracellular ROS was measured by CM-H2DCFDA. DNA DSBs were detected by immunofluorescent analysis with γ-H2AX as a marker. |
Intracellular ROS increased by ~3.7-fold p-ATM increased by ~4.7-fold. γ-H2AX increased by ~3.4-fold. |
Incidence Concordance
|
Reference |
Experiment Description |
Result |
|
Meng et al., 2021 |
In vitro, human LECs exposed to 50 µM H2O2 with DCFH-DA fluorescent probe to detect ROS levels and immunofluorescence and western blot assay to detect γ-H2AX. |
50 µM H2O2 exposure to lens epithelial cells increased oxidative stress, with ROS measured by LDH, by 4-fold and decreased the level of antioxidants by 2-fold as measured by SOD and GSH-PX. This resulted in 3-fold increase in γ-H2AX. |
|
Smith et al., 2015 |
In vitro, human LECs exposed to 30 µM H2O2 with alkaline comet assay to determine amount of strand breaks. |
Treatment of lens epithelial cells to 30 µM H2O2 induced DNA strand breaks by 55% at 0.5 hr after exposure and increased the level of LDH by ~1.4 fold at 24 hr post-exposure. |
|
Liu et al. 2013 |
In vitro, human LECs exposed to 30 µM H2O2 with alkaline comet assay determination of strand breaks. |
LDH increased by ~1.4 fold at 24 hr post-exposure, with a 5x increase from control levels in DNA strand breaks. |
Time Concordance
|
Reference |
Experiment Description |
Result |
|
Yang et al., 1998 |
In vitro, rabbit LECs exposed to H2O2 with TCA addition and thiol assay to determine non-protein thiol (NP-SH) level and alkaline elusion assay to determine strand breaks. |
In rabbit LECs exposed in vitro to 125 µM H2O2, non-protein thiol levels decreased to <5% control (indicates oxidative stress) 30 min post-irradiation, and % DNA retained using alkaline elution decreased by 1.6 log (indicates increased DNA fragmentation) within the next 8.5 h. |
Response-response Relationship
Time-scale
Known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER
N/A
This KER is plausible in all life stages, sexes, and organisms with DNA. The evidence is from human, rodent, rabbit and bovine in vitro studies that do not specify the sex, as well as an adult rat in vivo study.