This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 2789

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

Altered, Nitric Oxide Levels leads to Increase, Endothelial Dysfunction

Upstream event
The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help
Downstream event
The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name Adjacency Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding Point of Contact Author Status OECD Status
Deposition of energy leads to vascular remodeling adjacent Moderate Low Cataia Ives (send email) Open for citation & comment

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER.  More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
human Homo sapiens Low NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus Moderate NCBI
rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus Low NCBI

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help
Sex Evidence
Male Moderate
Female Low
Unspecific Low

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER.  More help
Term Evidence
Adult Low
Not Otherwise Specified Moderate

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

Altered nitric oxide (NO) levels can lead to endothelial dysfunction (Soloviev & Kizub, 2019).  In a functional endothelium, NO is bioavailable and is involved in preventing inflammation, proliferation and thrombosis (Deanfield, Halcox & Rabelink, 2007; Kruger-Genge et al., 2019). An increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) along with increased NO can drive cellular senescence in endothelial cells (ECs) and catalyze endothelial dysfunction (Nagane et al., 2021; Wang, Boerma & Zhou, 2016). Another driver of endothelial dysfunction is reduced vasomotion. In a functional state, the endothelium requires a balance of vasoconstrictors and vasodilators (like NO); an interruption of this balance can lead to dysfunction (Deanfield, Halcox & Rabelink, 2007; Marti et al., 2012; Nagane et al., 2021; Schulz, Gori & Münzel, 2011; Soloviev & Kizub, 2019). Decreased NO due to direct reactions with ROS or uncoupling of NOS enzymes will lead to a reduced ability of smooth muscle cells (SMCs) to relax (Soloviev & Kizub, 2019).

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings.  Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

The strategy for collating the evidence on radiation stressors to support the relationship is described in Kozbenko et al 2022. Briefly, a scoping review methodology was used to prioritize studies based on a population, exposure, outcome, endpoint statement.

Evidence Map 2.0

ID Experimental Design Species Upstream Observation Downstream Observation Citation (first author, year) Notes

Evidence Map

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help
Title First Author
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance
Temporal Concordance
Incidence Concordance
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance Evidence
Temporal Concordance Evidence
Incidence Concordance Evidence
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help
  • Directionality of NO changes cannot be compared between studies due to a variety of experimental conditions like stressor type, dose, dose rate, model and time course of the experiment.

  • Irradiating in vivo rabbit carotid arteries with X-rays showed that endothelial dysfunction was higher after 8 Gy than 16 Gy (Hong et al., 2013). This was inconsistent with the ex vivo model, where endothelial dysfunction was highest after 16 Gy (Hong et al., 2013). Endothelial dysfunction was shown through a relaxation response to ACh.

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references.  More help

Modulating factor 

Details 

Effects on the KER 

References 

Drug  

AG (selective iNOS inhibitor) 

AG treatment prevented radiation-induced increase in peroxynitrite and endothelial dysfunction along with L-NA treatment. 

Hong et al., 2013 

Drug 

L-NA (general NOS inhibitor) 

L-NA treatment prevented radiation-induced increase in peroxynitrite and endothelial dysfunction 

Hong et al., 2013 

Drug 

DAHP (Gch1 inhibitor to inhibit BH4 synthesis) 

DAHP (100 mg/kg/body weight) further decreased eNOS, nitrite concentration and endothelial relaxation after irradiation. 

Yan et al., 2020 

Drug 

Losartan (AT1 receptor antagonist) 

Losartan restored the levels eNOS and iNOS expression and improved endothelial relaxation after HU. 

Zhang et al., 2009 

Drug 

Oxp (XO inhibitor) 

Oxp increased NO levels and endothelial relaxation. 

Soucy et al., 2010, 2011 

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help

The majority of the evidence is derived from in vivo rat models. A limited number of studies were in human and rabbit models. The relationship has been more commonly shown in vivo in male animals, specifically in adult male rodents.