This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 2611

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

Decrease,SIRT1(sirtuin 1) levels leads to Increase activation, Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB)

Upstream event
The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help
Downstream event
The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name Adjacency Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding Point of Contact Author Status OECD Status
Alcohol Induced DNA damage and mutations leading to Metastatic Breast Cancer adjacent Moderate Moderate Agnes Aggy (send email) Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite Under Development

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER.  More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
human and other cells in culture human and other cells in culture High NCBI
human Homo sapiens Moderate NCBI
mice Mus sp. Moderate NCBI

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help
Sex Evidence
Female High

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER.  More help
Term Evidence
Not Otherwise Specified Not Specified

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

Upstream event: Decreased, SIRT1

Downstream event: NF kB activity, Increased

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings.  Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

Evidence Map 2.0

ID Experimental Design Species Upstream Observation Downstream Observation Citation (first author, year) Notes

Evidence Map

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help
Title First Author
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance
Temporal Concordance
Incidence Concordance
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance Evidence
Temporal Concordance Evidence
Incidence Concordance Evidence
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help
  • SIRT1 can inhibit NF-κB signaling directly or indirectly, in turn the NF-κB system suppresses SIRT1-mediated functions by inhibiting the downstream targets of SIRT1. Given that SIRT1 and NF-κB signaling have antagonistic characteristics, these pathways control many of the physiologically relevant metabolic and inflammatory switches required for the maintenance of cellular and organismal homeostasis.
  • PGC-1 is a downstream target of the SIRT/AMPK signalling cascade that promotes oxidative metabolism by promoting mitochondrial biogenesis (Fernandez et al.,2011). In cardiac cells, Alvarez-Guardia et al. found that the RelA/p65 member of the NF-B complex was constitutively linked to the PGC-1 protein. They also discovered that activating NF-B after TNF exposure boosted the association between the RelA/p65 and PGC-1 proteins, resulting in an increase in glucose oxidation (Alvarez et al., 2010). These findings show that deacetylation of PGC-1 promotes mitochondrial oxidative respiration, whereas activation of NF-B signalling inhibits SIRT1/PGC-1 communication and activates aerobic glycolysis. This shift is known as the Warburg effect, which can be seen in cancer cells but also in ageing (Salminen et al., 2010). Overexpression of PGC-1, on the other hand, decreased the transcriptional activity of NF-B by lowering the phosphorylation of the transactivating RelA/p65 component(Eisele et al.,2013)

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references.  More help
  • NF-B can be activated by cytokines (TNF-, IL-1), growth factors (EGF), bacterial and viral products (lipopolysaccharide (LPS), dsRNA), UV and ionising radiation, reactive oxygen species (ROS), DNA damage, and oncogenic stress from inside the cells. Almost all stimuli eventually activate a large cytoplasmic protein complex called the inhibitor of B (IB) kinase (IKK) complex via a so-called "canonical pathway." The exact composition of this complex is unknown, however it has three fundamental components: IKK1/IKK, IKK2/IKK, and NEMO/IKK. IB is phosphorylated by the activated IKK complex, which marks it for destruction by the -transducin repeat-containing protein (-TrCP)-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase-mediated proteasomal degradation pathway (Liu et al., 2012;Li et al., 2002). As a result, unbound NF-B dimers can go from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, bind to DNA, and control gene transcription.
  • SIRT6 is a nuclear sirtuin that regulates the acetylation status and transcriptional activity of HIF1 and NFkB. SIRT6 deacetylates histone 3 lysine 8 (H3K9) at HIF1 target gene promoters and so acts as a corepressor of HIF1 transcriptional activity. SIRT6 modulation of glucose flow appears to be crucial, as SIRT6 deficiency results in fatal hypoglycemia (Zhong et al., 2010). SIRT6 inhibits NFkB function through a mechanism that is strikingly similar. SIRT6 also deacetylates H3K9 on the promoters of specific NFkB target genes, reducing NFkB's accessibility to these promoters (Kawahara et al., 2009). SIRT6 has a compensating impact in SIRT1 deficient animals, attenuating the enhanced NFkB activity due to an elevated acetylation state (Schug et al., 2010). Finally, although having different methods, both SIRT1 and SIRT6 are negative regulators of NFkB activity.
  • SIRT2 has been demonstrated to deacetylate the cytoplasmic lysine 310 (K310) of NFkB subunit p65 (Rothgiesser et al., 2010). SIRT2 suppresses NFkB activation and transcription of NFkB target genes in response to TNF stimulation in this way (Rothgiesser et al., 2010). After TNF exposure, SIRT2 silenced cells show higher NFkB activity and a reduced probability of cell death (Rothgiesser et al., 2010). As a result, SIRT2 in the cytosol and SIRT1 in the nucleus can both deacetylate NFkB.

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help

The KER has been noted in human and animal cell lines irrespevtive of gender or any specific life stage.