This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 2443

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

MCC, Decreased leads to Decreased lung function

Upstream event
The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help
Downstream event
The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name Adjacency Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding Point of Contact Author Status OECD Status
Oxidative stress Leading to Decreased Lung Function adjacent Moderate Moderate Brendan Ferreri-Hanberry (send email) Open for comment. Do not cite
Oxidative stress Leading to Decreased Lung Function via CFTR dysfunction adjacent Moderate Moderate Arthur Author (send email) Open for comment. Do not cite
Oxidative Stress Leading to Decreased Lung Function via Decreased FOXJ1 adjacent Agnes Aggy (send email) Open for comment. Do not cite

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER.  More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
Homo sapiens Homo sapiens High NCBI

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help
Sex Evidence
Mixed High

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER.  More help
Term Evidence
All life stages High

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

It is very well known that patients suffering from motile ciliopathies, such as primary ciliary dyskinesia, have impaired or absent MCC and lower lung function (reduced FEV1 and FVC) compared to their healthy counterparts (Halbeisen et al., 2018; Marthin et al., 2010; Wallmeier et al., 2020). In cystic fibrosis patients, decreased MCC (due to reduced airway hydration and changes in mucus chemical and viscoelastic properties) causes mucus build-up leading to mucus plugging in the airways and consequently to decreased lung function over time (Kerem et al., 2014; Mossberg et al., 1978; Regnis et al., 1994; Robinson and Bye, 2002; Szczesniak et al., 2017; Wanner et al., 1996). Mucus plugging due to decreased MCC is also considered a major cause of airway obstruction and airflow limitation in COPD patients (Dunican et al., 2021; Okajima et al., 2020) and asthmatics (Kuyper et al., 2003; Maxwell, 1985).

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings.  Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

Evidence Map 2.0

ID Experimental Design Species Upstream Observation Downstream Observation Citation (first author, year) Notes

Evidence Map

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help
Title First Author
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance
Temporal Concordance
Incidence Concordance
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance Evidence
Temporal Concordance Evidence
Incidence Concordance Evidence
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help

Genetic defects leading to motile ciliopathies or defects in CFTR function are linked to impaired MCC. However, because of the genetic variety, not every defect, for example in the CFTR gene, also expresses an overt pulmonary phenotype. Other factors, such as low-level chronic inflammation may drive lung pathology by pathways independent of MCC. This might also explain the absence of differences in MCC between healthy smokers and smokers with COPD (Fleming et al., 2019). Not all studies looking to elucidate the effect of mucolytics on MCC report an improvement of lung function, even though mucus transport rates or tracheobronchial clearance significantly improve. These studies include, for example, some on the effects of hypertonic saline solution, NAC, ambroxol and 2-mercapto-ethane sulphonate (Clarke et al., 1979; Ericsson et al., 1987; Millar et al., 1985; Robinson et al., 1997; Würtemberger et al., 1988). This could be, at least in part, related to the fact that a sudden drop in lung function served as an indicator of patient distress in these studies, and interventions were halted when they occurred to ensure patient safety (Robinson et al., 1996). Another reason could be related to the mechanisms underlying mucus solubilization that may be completely independent of lung function. MCC is only one means by which mucus can be cleared from the lungs. Another one is cough clearance, and it is highly dependent on the properties of the ASL, in particular the ASL height (Knowles and Boucher, 2002).

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references.  More help

Invariably, if mucus viscosity increases (independent of whether that results from increased mucus production (hypersecretion), depletion of the ASL or another cause) and MCC decreases, another mechanism comes into action to clear excess mucus: cough clearance. Cough constitutes a “backup” host defense by which acutely or chronically accumulated mucus is expelled through forceful, high-velocity airflow (Button et al., 2018; King, 2006). Our current understanding of the mechanical principles and biology of cough suggest that failure of cough clearance may also be a contributor to decreased lung function.

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help

The evidences for this KER come from and therefore apply to humans.