This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
Relationship: 1982
Title
Energy Deposition leads to Increase, Chromosomal aberrations
Upstream event
Downstream event
AOPs Referencing Relationship
| AOP Name | Adjacency | Weight of Evidence | Quantitative Understanding | Point of Contact | Author Status | OECD Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deposition of energy leading to lung cancer | non-adjacent | High | High | Brendan Ferreri-Hanberry (send email) | Open for citation & comment | EAGMST Approved |
| Deposition of energy leading to occurrence of cataracts | non-adjacent | High | High | Arthur Author (send email) | Open for citation & comment |
Taxonomic Applicability
Sex Applicability
| Sex | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Unspecific | High |
Life Stage Applicability
| Term | Evidence |
|---|---|
| All life stages | High |
Energy can be deposited on biomolecules from various forms of radiation in a randomized manner. Radiation with high linear energy transfer (LET) tends to produce more complex, dense structural damage than low LET radiation; both, however, can lead to detrimental damage within a cell (Bauchinger and Schmid 1998; Evans et al., 2001; Hada and Georgakilas 2008; Okayasu 2012; Lorat et al. 2015; Nikitaki et al. 2016). The DNA is particularly susceptible to damage in the form of DNA strand breaks. This damaged DNA can lead to aberrations/rearrangements in chromosomes and chromatids. Examples of chromosome-type aberrations include chromosome-type breaks, ring chromosomes, and dicentric chromosomes, while chromatid-type aberrations refer to chromatid-type breaks and chromatid exchanges (Hagmar et al. 2004; Bonassi et al. 2008). Other types of CAs that may occur in response to radiation include micronuclei (MN), nucleoplasmic bridges (NPBs), and copy number variants (CNVs). CAs may also be classified as stable aberrations (translocations, inversions, insertions and deletions) and unstable aberrations (dicentric chromosomes, acentric fragments, centric rings and MN) (Hunter and Muirhead 2009; Zölzer et al. 2013; Qian et al. 2016).
The strategy for collating the evidence to support the relationship is described in Kozbenko et al 2022. Briefly, a scoping review methodology was used to prioritize studies based on a population, exposure, outcome, endpoint statement.
| ID | Experimental Design | Species | Upstream Observation | Downstream Observation | Citation (first author, year) | Notes |
|---|
| Title | First Author | Biological Plausibility |
Dose Concordance |
Temporal Concordance |
Incidence Concordance |
|---|
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance Evidence
Temporal Concordance Evidence
Incidence Concordance Evidence
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Uncertainties and inconsistencies in this KER are as follows:
- An individual’s response to radiation can be affected by a large variety of factors. Many of them cannot be controlled in a study, therefore leading to inconsistencies in results (Bender et al., 1988).
- When an organism is exposed to an initial low radiation dose followed by a higher dose, it can initiate an adaptive response, therefore decreasing the resulting damage. Day et al. also found this to be applicable when a low radiation dose was followed by an even lower dose (2007).
|
Modulating Factor |
Details |
Effects on the KER |
References |
|
Sex |
Females |
Females were found to have increased aberrant cells and chromosome breaks relative to males. |
Maffei et al., 2004 |
|
Age |
Increased or decreased age |
Increases in age were associated with increased CAs. However, it has also been found that young organisms are more sensitive to radiation. One possible explanation for this is that dividing cells are more radiosensitive than those that are quiescent. |
Blakely, 2012; Santovito et al., 2013; Vellingiri et al., 2014 |
|
Smoking |
Smoking status |
Smoking was found to increase chromosomal damage. Chromosome breaks were found to be significantly increased in smokers relative to non-smokers. Likewise, blood samples from smokers that were exposed to radon gas had lymphocytes with significantly increased dicentric aberrations, acentric fragments, chromatid breaks, MN, and NPBs relative to lymphocytes from non-smokers also exposed to radon gas. |
Maffei et al., 2004; Meenakshi and Mohankumar 2013; Meenakshi et al., 2017 |
|
Hyperthermia |
Increased temperature |
In cells exposed to hyperthermic conditions (41°C for 1 h) followed by radiation (4 Gy), there were significant increases in chromosomal translocations and chromosomal fragments at 1 and at 24 h post-exposure, respectively, as compared to cells exposed only to radiation. |
Bergs et al., 2016 |
|
DNA ligase IV |
Presence |
DNA ligase IV helps prevent DNA degradation and increase accurate DNA rejoining, therefore decreasing chromosome breaks and radiation-induced MN. |
Smith et al., 2003; Foray et al., 2016 |
|
Genetic syndromes |
Cockayne syndrome, AT-like disorder, Nijmegen breakage syndrome, Bloom’s syndrome, xeroderma pigmentosum, Fanconi anemia, and ataxia telangiectasia |
The presence of one of these conditions can increase the number of CAs. |
Bender et al., 1988; Foray et al., 2016 |
|
Antioxidants or antigenotoxic agents |
Increased concentration, examples include dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) |
The compounds can help decrease the frequency of CAs after irradiation. |
Yang, 1999; Kim and Lee, 2007 |
Quantitative understanding of this linkage suggests that CA frequency can be predicted from the radiation, as per the representative examples provided below. When predicting this relationship, the characteristics of the radiation and the model system should be taken into account (Smith et al. 2003; Hunter and Muirhead 2009). It is widely accepted that the deposition of energy, at all doses, results in immediate ionization events, followed by downstream events. The following tables provide representative examples of the relationship, unless otherwise indicated, all data is significantly significant.
Dose Concordance
|
Reference |
Experiment Description |
Result |
|
Suto et al., 2015 |
In vitro. Human peripheral blood lymphocytes were exposed to 60Co γ-rays at 0 – 300 mGy and 5 mGy/sec. The number of dicentrics and translocations in chromosomes 1, 2, and 4 were determined using three differentially colored chromosome painting probes. |
Study of human peripheral blood lymphocytes from a healthy donor subjected to γ-ray radiation in the dose (D) range of 0 - 300 mGy found a calculated CA rate (y) of dicentrics, translocations and dicentrics+translocations (of the quadratic form, y = a + bD + bD^2) found - dicentrics + translocations (a,b,c := 0.0023 ± 0.0003, 0.0015 ± 0.0058, 0.0819 ± 0.0225), dicentrics (a,b,c := 0.0004 ± 0.0001, 0.0008 ± 0.0028, 0.0398 ± 0.0117), translocations (a,b,c := 0.0019 ± 0.0003, 0.0008 ± 0.0028, 0.0398 ± 0.0117). |
|
Abe et al., 2018 |
In vitro. Human mononuclear blood cells from five donors (four males aged 23, 35, 44, and 55 years old, and a 33-year-old female) were exposed to 60Co γ-rays at 0 – 1000 mGy. The dose rate in the irradiator was 26.6 mGy/min with an additional 6.42 mGy to the sample while entering and leaving the irradiation source. None of the subjects had a history of radiotherapy, smoking, or chemotherapy. The number of dicentrics and translocations in chromosomes 1, 2, and 4 were determined using Giemsa staining and Centromere-FISH staining. |
Study of human mononuclear blood cells from healthy donors; analyzed for dicentric chromosomes. Exposure to γ-ray doses (D) in the 0 - 1000 mGy range. Quadratic form fit for the CA rate in Giemsa staining and Centromere-FISH staining cases (y) (of the form y = a + bD + cD^2) found to be: Giemsa staining: (a,b,c := 0.0013 ± 0.0005, 0.0067 ± 0.0071, 0.0313 ± 0.0091), Centromere-FISH staining (a,b,c := 0.0010 ± 0.0004, 0.0186 ± 0.0081, 0.0329 ± 0.0104). Study of mononuclear blood cells from healthy donors; analyzed for translocations. Exposure to γ-ray doses (D) in the 0 - 1000 mGy range. Quadratic form fit for the CA rate (y) before and after donor age adjustment (of the form y = a + bD + cD^2) found to be: before donor age adjustment: (a,b,c := 0.0053 ± 0.0009, 0.259 ± 0.0127, 0.0826 ± 0.0161), after donor age adjustment (a,b,c := 0.0015 ± 0.0009, 0.0049 ± 0.0155, 0.1033 ± 0.0223). |
|
Jang et al., 2019 |
In vitro. Human peripheral blood lymphocytes from four different donors (two males, 36 and 22 years old, and two females, 28 and 24 years old) were exposed to 6 MV X-rays at 0-5 Gy and 0.5 Gy/min. None of the subjects had a history of chemotherapy, smoking, or radiotherapy. The number of dicentrics and translocations in chromosomes 1, 2, and 4 were determined using Giemsa staining and chromosome painting, respectively. |
Human peripheral blood lymphocytes studied from healthy donors. Lymphocytes irradiated with X-rays in a dose (D) range 0 - 5 Gy. Calculated CA rate from dicentrics or translocations (y) (of the form y = a + bD + cD^2). Dicentrics, (a,b,c := 0.0011 ± 0.0004, 0.0119 ± 0.0032, 0.0617 ± 0.0019). Translocations, (a,b,c := 0.0015 ± 0.0004, 0.0048 ± 0.0024, 0.0237 ± 0.0014). |
|
Schmid et al., 2002 |
In vitro. Human peripheral blood lymphocytes from one male donor were exposed to 29 kV X-rays at 0.115 – 2.194 Gy and at 0.009 – 0.140 Gy/min. CAs were determined with fluorescence plus Giemsa staining. |
Study of various X- and γ-ray types irradiating peripheral human blood lymphocytes, analyzed dicentrics and acentrics (10, 29, 60, 220 kV X-rays & Cs-137, Co-60 γ-rays). See Schmid et al. (2002) for details on equations. |
|
George et al., 2009 |
In vitro. HF19 normal primary lung fibroblasts, AT primary fibroblasts, NSB1-deficient primary fibroblasts, M059K glioblastoma cells, and M059J glioblastoma cells were exposed to iron nuclei (1000 MeV/nucleon, 0.2 – 0.5 Gy/min, average LET of 151 keV/um), and 137Cs γ-rays (0.2 – 1 Gy/min) at 0 – 3 Gy. CAs in chromosomes 1, 2, 4, and 11 were determined using FISH staining. |
γ-rays and iron nuclei irradiating HF19 normal primary lung fibroblasts; Ataxia telangiectasia (AT) primary fibroblasts; NSB1-deficient primary fibroblasts (Nijmegen breakage syndrome); M059K glioblastoma cells & M059J glioblastoma cells (lack DNA-dependent protein kinase activity). Dose range of 0 - 3 Gy. See Table 5 & 6 of George et al. (2009) for details on equations. |
|
Wolf et al. 2008 |
In vivo. Female, C57BL/6 mice received head-only exposure to 11 Gy soft X-rays. Mice were either 2 or 26 months-old at irradiation. 6 were irradiated and 6 were non-irradiated controls. Chromosomal aberrations were detected using Wright-trypsin G-banding. |
Irradiation of eight-week-old mice with 11 Gy of X-rays increased the number of abnormal chromosomes from 15 (control) to 27. Irradiation of 26-month-old mice with 11 Gy of X-rays increased the number of abnormal chromosomes from 0 (control) to 30). However, the significance of these results was not indicated. |
|
Williams et al., 1999 |
In vitro. Human lymphocyte cells were exposed to Fe ions (0 – 1 Gy, 1 GeV incident energy), 137Cs photons (0 – 7.5 Gy, 83 cGy/min), and protons (5 Gy, 250 keV incident energy). Chromosomal aberrations were identified using Leishman’s stain. |
CAs rose from 0 to 0.001, 0.004, 0.014, and 0.017 after exposure to 1 Gy 137Cs, 1 Gy Fe, 5 Gy 137Cs, and 5 Gy energetic photons respectively. |
|
Evans et al., 2001 |
In vitro. TK6 and WTK1 human lymphoblastoid cells were exposed to 56Fe ions (0 – 2.25 Gy, 1087 MeV/nucleon) and 137Cs γ-rays (0 – 4 Gy, 0.87 – 0.92 Gy/min). CAs were assessed using Giemsa staining. |
Exposure to higher doses resulted in increased amounts of aberrant cells. For example, in TK6 cells after 56Fe irradiation, 0% of cells were aberrant in the control, 19% were aberrant after 0.63 Gy, and 66% were aberrant after 2.25 Gy. Additionally, 56Fe ions induced increased numbers of aberrant cells when compared to 137Cs γ-rays. |
|
Hande et al., 2005 |
In vivo. Lymphocytes from 31 Russian reactor and plutonium workers were exposed to plutonium ions and γ-rays. Highly exposed plutonium workers received 1.1 Gy of Pu and 1.5 Gy of γ-rays. Moderately exposed plutonium workers received 0.19 Gy of Pu and 0.19 Gy of γ-rays. Reactor workers received only 2.3 Gy of γ-rays. Values are averages. CAs were detected using the mFISH assay. |
The amount of interchromosomal complex translocations were 2.9, 0.23, and 0.21% higher than controls in workers highly exposed, moderately exposed, and exposed to only γ-rays, respectively. The amount of interchromosomal simple translocations were 5.1, 1.5, and 4% higher than controls in workers highly exposed, moderately exposed, and exposed to only γ-rays, respectively. |
|
Durante et al., 1998 |
In vitro. Human male lymphocyte cells were exposed to carbon ions (5 Gy, 290 meV/nucleon, 42 keV/μm), neon ions (7 Gy, 400 MeV/nucleon, 31 keV/μm), hydrogen ions (1, 3, 5, 7 Gy, 0.4 keV/μm), and iron ions (0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, Gy, 1000 MeV/nucleon, 140 keV/μm). Chromosomal aberrations were detected using DAPI-counterstaining the PAINT classification. |
As the dose increased from 0 to 7 Gy, the number of DNA breaks per human male lymphocyte cell also increased from 0 to 1.2. This included data using iron ions, hydrogen ions, carbon, and neon. |
|
Tao et al., 1994 |
In vivo. 90 – 110-day old B6CF1/Anl mice received irradiation to the anterior 2/3 of the body with 60Co γ-rays (10 – 40 cGy), 20Ne (670 MeV/amu, 25 keV/um), 56Fe (600 MeV/amu, 193 keV/um), 93Nb (600 MeV/amu, 464 keV/um), 139La (593 MeV/um, 953 keV/um). All stressors except 60Co delivered 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, and 320 cGy. Doses were delivered to the anterior 2/3 of the body. CAs were detected using a modified Feulgen method 64 weeks post-exposure. |
Mouse lenses exposed to all radiation types showed increased MN number per whole mount at increasing doses from 10 to 160 cGy. For example, irradiation from 56Fe particles led to a MN number of 10 after 10 cGy and an MN number of 100 after 160 cGy. |
|
Bains et al., 2019 |
In vitro. Human LECs were exposed to X-rays at 0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.02, 0.1, 1, and 2 Gy. Doses of 0.1, 1.0, and 2.0 had a dose rate of 0.58 Gy/min. 0.001, 0.01 and 0.02 Gy at 0.022 Gy/min. The γ-H2AX assay was used to determine the number of telomere dysfunction induced foci (TIF). |
At 30 min after irradiation, the number of TIF/human lens epithelial cell remained almost 0 after exposure to 0, 0.001, and 0.01 Gy. It then rose quickly to 4.75 TIF/cell at 2 Gy. |
|
Udroiu et al., 2020 |
In vitro. Human LECs were exposed to X-rays at 25, 51.25, 135, 235, and 300 mGy at 0.51, 0.15, and 0.228 Gy/min. The micronuclei frequency was measured with a cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay. |
In human LECs exposed to 25 – 300 mGy the micronuclei frequency increased steadily, reaching 2.4x control at the maximum dose. |
|
Dalke et al., 2018 |
In vivo. 10-week-old, mixed sex B6C3F1 and B6RCF1 hybrid mice received whole-body exposure to 0.063, 0.125, and 0.5 Gy 60Co γ-rays at 0.063 Gy/min. CAs were assessed using Giemsa staining. |
In heterozygous Ercc2 mutants, 12 months after irradiation, the number of aberrations/cell rose from 0.1 (control) to 0.82 (0.5 Gy). There was also a slightly smaller increase after 18 months where the number of chromosomal aberrations/cell rose from 0.1 (control) to 0.3 (0.5 Gy). In wild type mice the largest increase occurred after 12 months where the number of aberrations/cell rose from 0.12 (control) to 0.32 (0.5 Gy). |
Time Concordance
|
Reference |
Experiment Description |
Result |
|
Tucker et al., 2004 |
In vivo. 7-week-old female C57BL/6 mice transgenic for lacZ received whole-body exposure to 1 Gy of 26Fe ions at 1 Gy/min. Aberrations on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, and 8 were determined with a FISH assay. |
Lymphocytes from mice exposed immediately to 1 Gy of iron ions had 19 translocations per 100 cells, 14 acentric fragments per 100 cells, and 10 dicentric chromosomes per 100 cells at 1 week post-irradiation. |
|
Tao et al., 1994 |
In vivo. 90 – 110-day old B6CF1/Anl mice received irradiation to the anterior 2/3 of the body with 60Co γ-rays (10 – 40 cGy), 20Ne (670 MeV/amu, 25 keV/um), 56Fe (600 MeV/amu, 193 keV/um), 93Nb (600 MeV/amu, 464 keV/um), 139La (593 MeV/um, 953 keV/um). All stressors except 60Co delivered 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, and 320 cGy. Doses were delivered to the anterior 2/3 of the body. CAs were detected using a modified Feulgen method. |
Mouse lenses exposed immediately to all radiation types showed increased MN number per whole mount at increasing doses from 10 to 160 cGy at 64 weeks post-irradiation. For example, irradiation from 56Fe particles led to a MN number of 10 after 10 cGy and an MN number of 100 after 160 cGy at 64 weeks post-irradiation. |
|
Tao et al., 1993 |
In vivo. 90 – 110-day old female B6CF mice received irradiation to the anterior 2/3 of the body with 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, and 320 cGy of protons: 250 MeV, LET 0.4 keV/um. 20Ne: 670 MeV/amu, LET 25 keV/um. 56Fe: 600 MeV/amu, LET 183 keV/um. 56Fe: 350 MeV/amu, LET 219 keV/um. 93Nb: 600 MeV/amu, LET 464 keV/um. 139La: 593 MeV/amu, 953 keV/amu. Fragmented nuclei (FN) and MN were detected using a modified Feulgen staining method or haematoxylin and eosin staining. |
In mice immediately irradiated with iron ions, the number of FN in the whole mount of lens cells increased from 1.5 FN (control) to 11 FN at 160 cGy after 64 weeks. The number of FN in the meridional rows increased from 0 (control) to 6 FN at 160 cGy after 64 weeks as well. The number of MN on the whole mount also increased from 0 to 100 at 160 cGy after 64 weeks. Similar changes were also observed with the other radiation types. |
|
Belkacémi et al., 2001 |
In vitro. Bovine lens cells were exposed to 10 Gy at 2 Gy/min from a linear accelerator. The Hoechst 33342 fluorescence was used to measure chromosomal aberrations. |
In lens cells immediately irradiated with X-rays, Hoechst 33342 fluorescence increased 13%, 25%, and 32% above controls at 24, 72, and 96 h post-irradiation, respectively. |
|
Bains et al., 2019 |
In vitro. Human LECs were exposed to X-rays at 0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.02, 0.1, 1, and 2 Gy. Doses of 0.1, 1.0, and 2.0 had a dose rate of 0.58 Gy/min. 0.001, 0.01 and 0.02 Gy at 0.022 Gy/min. |
In human LECs immediately exposed in vitro to 0.02 Gy, the number of telomere dysfunction-induced foci (TIF)/cell increased to 3x control 30 min post-irradiation. |
|
Dalke et al., 2018 |
In vivo. 10-week-old, mixed sex B6C3F1 and B6RCF1 hybrid mice received whole-body exposure to 0.063, 0.125, and 0.5 Gy 60Co γ-rays at 0.063 Gy/min. CAs were assessed using Giemsa staining. |
In mice immediately exposed to 0.125-0.5 Gy of γ-rays, CAs were observed after 12 months, increasing to a maximum of 0.82 CAs/cell at 0.5 Gy. |
Response-response Relationship
There is evidence of a positive response-response relationship between the radiation dose and the frequency of CAs (Tao et al., 1993; Tao et al., 1994; Durante et al., 1998; Williams et al., 1999; Belkacémi et al., 2001; Evans et al., 2001; Schmid et al. 2002; Thomas et al. 2003;Tucker et al., 2004; Hande et al., 2005; Tucker et al. 2005a; Tucker et al. 2005b; Wolf et al., 2008; George et al. 2009; Arlt et al. 2014; Balajee et al. 2014; Suto et al. 2015; Mcmahon et al. 2016; Abe et al. 2018; Dalke et al., 2018; Bains et al., 2019; Jang et al. 2019; Udroiu et al., 2020). Most studies found that the response-response relationship was linear-quadratic (Schmid et al. 2002; Suto et al. 2015; Foray et al., 2016; Abe et al. 2018; Jang et al. 2019). One study, however, reported different results when CAs were examined across five cell lines that had been irradiated with either iron nuclei or γ-rays. For complex aberrations in three types of fibroblasts (two of which were deficient in DNA repair), the best fit was a quadratic relationship for both γ-rays and iron ions; for simple aberrations induced by iron ions in these cells, there was a linear relationship found. In two tumor cell lines, a linear response was defined for simple aberrations for both types of radiation, while the response for complex aberrations was not well-defined by the models that were evaluated (George et al. 2009).
Time-scale
The time scale relationship between radiation exposure and the frequency of CAs has been examined. Most studies search for CAs hours, days, weeks, or even years after exposure to radiation (Loucas and Geard, 1994; Durante et al., 1998; Schmid et al. 2002; Thomas et al. 2003; Tucker et al., 2004; Tucker et al. 2005a; Tucker et al. 2005b; George et al. 2009; Meenakshi and Mohankumar 2013; Arlt et al. 2014; Balajee et al. 2014; Han et al. 2014; Suto et al. 2015; Cheki et al. 2016; Mcmahon et al. 2016; Basheerudeen et al. 2017; Meenakshi et al. 2017; Abe et al. 2018; Jang et al. 2019) ; this makes it particularly difficult to identify CA induction in relation to the deposition of energy by ionizing radiation. There is an account, however, of CAs appearing within 20 minutes of irradiation, with levels peaking at 40 min and plateauing for the remainder of the experiment (up to 100 min) (Mcmahon et al. 2016). CAs have also been documented 2 - 3 h after radiation exposure, with frequency being shown to increase slightly at 24 h (Basheerudeen et al. 2017). CA frequency begins to decrease after exposure, but not all aberrations are repaired (Loucas and Geard, 1994; Durante et al., 1998; Tucker et al., 2004). This process also appears to depend on LET, with strand breaks induced by radiation with a lower LET able to be repaired quicker than those induced by a higher LET (Durante et al., 1998). Furthermore, a study examining CAs in human blood samples for 2 - 7 days following irradiation with γ-rays found that CAs were present at the 2-day mark, but had declined by day 7 (Tucker et al. 2005a; Tucker et al. 2005b) to suspected asymptotic minimum levels (Tucker et al. 2005b). For translocations specifically, the relationship between time and translocation frequency was found to be linear at low doses (0 - 0.5 Gy) and linear quadratic at higher doses (0.5 - 4 Gy) (Tucker et al. 2005b). The sharpest decline over the 7 days was found in dicentrics, acentric fragments, and ring chromosomes (Tucker et al. 2005a).
Interestingly, in vivo radiation exposure has been shown to induce long-lasting CAs in a relatively short time-frame. When lymphocytes from patients undergoing an interventional radiology procedure were compared pre-procedure and 2-3 h post-procedure, there were significant increases in chromatid-type aberrations, chromosome-type aberrations, dicentrics and MN in post-procedure lymphocytes)(Basheerudeen et al. 2017). Similarly, lymphocytes from subjects exposed to radiation 32-41 years prior to blood collection were found to have significantly increased chromosome-type aberrations (acentric fragments, dicentrics and translocations) and MN relative to unexposed controls (Han et al. 2014). Taken together, the results from these two studies suggest that CAs are not only induced within mere h of radiation exposure, but that these radiation-induced CAs may also endure for several decades.
Known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER
Not identified.
This KER is plausible in all life stages, sexes, and organisms with chromosomes. The majority of the evidence is from in vivo adult mice and human, and bovine in vitro models.