This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 1982

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

Energy Deposition leads to Increase, Chromosomal aberrations

Upstream event
The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help
Downstream event
The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name Adjacency Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding Point of Contact Author Status OECD Status
Deposition of energy leading to lung cancer non-adjacent High High Brendan Ferreri-Hanberry (send email) Open for citation & comment EAGMST Approved
Deposition of energy leading to occurrence of cataracts non-adjacent High High Arthur Author (send email) Open for citation & comment

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER.  More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
human Homo sapiens High NCBI
mouse Mus musculus High NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus High NCBI

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help
Sex Evidence
Unspecific High

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER.  More help
Term Evidence
All life stages High

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

Energy can be deposited on biomolecules from various forms of radiation in a randomized manner. Radiation with high linear energy transfer (LET) tends to produce more complex, dense structural damage than low LET radiation; both, however, can lead to detrimental damage within a cell (Bauchinger and Schmid 1998; Evans et al., 2001; Hada and Georgakilas 2008; Okayasu 2012; Lorat et al. 2015; Nikitaki et al. 2016). The DNA is particularly susceptible to damage in the form of DNA strand breaks.  This damaged DNA can lead to aberrations/rearrangements in chromosomes and chromatids. Examples of chromosome-type aberrations include chromosome-type breaks, ring chromosomes, and dicentric chromosomes, while chromatid-type aberrations refer to chromatid-type breaks and chromatid exchanges (Hagmar et al. 2004; Bonassi et al. 2008). Other types of CAs that may occur in response to radiation include micronuclei (MN), nucleoplasmic bridges (NPBs), and copy number variants (CNVs). CAs may also be classified as stable aberrations (translocations, inversions, insertions and deletions) and unstable aberrations (dicentric chromosomes, acentric fragments, centric rings and MN) (Hunter and Muirhead 2009; Zölzer et al. 2013; Qian et al. 2016). 

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings.  Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

The strategy for collating the evidence to support the relationship is described in Kozbenko et al 2022.  Briefly, a scoping review methodology was used to prioritize studies based on a population, exposure, outcome, endpoint statement.

Evidence Map 2.0

ID Experimental Design Species Upstream Observation Downstream Observation Citation (first author, year) Notes

Evidence Map

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help
Title First Author
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance
Temporal Concordance
Incidence Concordance
Biological Plausibility
Dose Concordance Evidence
Temporal Concordance Evidence
Incidence Concordance Evidence
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help

Uncertainties and inconsistencies in this KER are as follows:

  • An individual’s response to radiation can be affected by a large variety of factors. Many of them cannot be controlled in a study, therefore leading to inconsistencies in results (Bender et al., 1988). 
  • When an organism is exposed to an initial low radiation dose followed by a higher dose, it can initiate an adaptive response, therefore decreasing the resulting damage. Day et al. also found this to be applicable when a low radiation dose was followed by an even lower dose (2007). 

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references.  More help

Modulating Factor 

Details 

Effects on the KER 

References 

Sex 

Females 

Females were found to have increased aberrant cells and chromosome breaks relative to males. 

Maffei et al., 2004 

Age 

Increased or decreased age 

Increases in age were associated with increased CAs. However, it has also been found that young organisms are more sensitive to radiation. One possible explanation for this is that dividing cells are more radiosensitive than those that are quiescent. 

Blakely, 2012; Santovito et al., 2013; Vellingiri et al., 2014 

Smoking 

Smoking status 

Smoking was found to increase chromosomal damage. Chromosome breaks were found to be significantly increased in smokers relative to non-smokers. Likewise, blood samples from smokers that were exposed to radon gas had lymphocytes with significantly increased dicentric aberrations, acentric fragments, chromatid breaks, MN, and NPBs relative to lymphocytes from non-smokers also exposed to radon gas. 

Maffei et al., 2004; Meenakshi and Mohankumar 2013; Meenakshi et al., 2017 

Hyperthermia 

Increased temperature 

In cells exposed to hyperthermic conditions (41°C for 1 h) followed by radiation (4 Gy), there were significant increases in chromosomal translocations and chromosomal fragments at 1 and at 24 h post-exposure, respectively, as compared to cells exposed only to radiation. 

Bergs et al., 2016 

DNA ligase IV 

Presence 

DNA ligase IV helps prevent DNA degradation and increase accurate DNA rejoining, therefore decreasing chromosome breaks and radiation-induced MN. 

Smith et al., 2003; Foray et al., 2016 

Genetic syndromes 

Cockayne syndrome, AT-like disorder, Nijmegen breakage syndrome, Bloom’s syndrome, xeroderma pigmentosum, Fanconi anemia, and ataxia telangiectasia 

The presence of one of these conditions can increase the number of CAs. 

Bender et al., 1988; Foray et al., 2016 

Antioxidants or antigenotoxic agents 

Increased concentration, examples include dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) 

The compounds can help decrease the frequency of CAs after irradiation. 

Yang, 1999; Kim and Lee, 2007 

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help

This KER is plausible in all life stages, sexes, and organisms with chromosomes. The majority of the evidence is from in vivo adult mice and human, and bovine in vitro models.